Research Proposal with Annotated Bibliography Assignment:
This will be a multi-step project that will produce a research paper to be turned-in at the end of the semester. Details for your research paper will be given at a later date.
What is a research proposal?
A research proposal is a plan; these plans are done with great care and attention to detail. Careful planning while constructing your proposal will save you time later during the writing of your paper. The goal of a research proposal is to: Tell me what you are writing about, how you are researching it, your work schedule/timeline, and what perspective you will be using to guide you. A template is provided in this document for you to use for formatting your proposal. Organization is crucial for this project.
What is an Annotated Bibliography?
A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) gathered for research on a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called “References” or “Works Cited” depending on the style format you are using. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (i.e., the author, title, publisher, etc.).
An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation. Some annotations merely summarize the source.
• What are the main arguments?
• What is the point of this book or article?
• The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is.
After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it.
• Is it a useful source?
• How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? I
• s the information reliable?
• Is this source biased or objective?
• What is the goal of this source?
Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research.
• Was this source helpful to you?
• How does it help you shape your argument?
• How can you use this source in your research project?
• Has it changed how you think about your topic?
Writing an annotated bibliography is excellent preparation for a research project. Just collecting sources for a bibliography is useful, but when you have to write annotations for each source, you’re forced to read each source more carefully. You begin to read more critically instead of just collecting information. At the professional level, annotated bibliographies allow you to see what has been done in the literature and where your own research or scholarship can fit. To help you formulate a thesis: Every good research paper is an argument. The purpose of research is to state and support a thesis. So, a very important part of research is developing a thesis that is debatable, interesting, and current. Writing an annotated bibliography can help you gain a good perspective on what is being said about your topic. By reading and responding to a variety of sources on a topic, you’ll start to see what the issues are, what people are arguing about, and you’ll then be able to develop your own point of view.
See Purdue Owl for more information on Annotated bibliographies: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/index.html
Requirements and Due Dates:
Proposal must be approximately 500-600 words.
Proposal must use the format provided on next page.
Proposal must be 12pt. Times New Roman, 1in. margins, double-spaced throughout.
Proposal (without bibliography) Rough Draft Due in Dropbox: Sunday, March 14th by 11:59 pm.
I will review everyone’s draft during Spring Break.
Research Proposals with Annotated Bibliography Final Drafts are Due in Folio Dropbox by Sunday, March 28th by 11:59 pm
Annotated Bibliography: The bibliography will consist of at least 10 citations of scholarly sources and an annotation of each. The goal of this section is to acquaint you with the various research databases and resources available via the library. The assignment will also help you learn how to evaluate the scholarly work of others and how to incorporate the work of others into your own work. You need to have a brief description for this section of your bibliography (see example attached).
Each bibliographic entry needs to adhere to your chosen formatting guidelines. Each annotation of a scholarly article or book chapter should be at least 250-300 words long. You should summarize the thesis and the basic line of argument of each source. In addition, you should briefly comment on the effectiveness of the argument in each source. You should also comment on how the source responds to and/or engages with one another. Include a word count at the end of each annotation.
Source requirements: 10 sources
(Must come from a credible news source)
• At least 4 books from GSU Library.
• At least 2 scholarly articles from Galileo
• At least 2 Current/Real World Events
• At least 2 of your choice (Video, Interview, Magazine, Newspaper, etc.)
Name Instructor Class
Your question should be based on your major.
Your research should not begin with you thinking you already know the answer to your question. Still, you may have some ideas about what you will find during your research. Write up your ideas as a hypothesis you will test with your research.
Statement of Significance
Your statement of significance should address the following questions: Why should anyone care about this question or topic? What is its importance?
Your existing knowledge provides a baseline for you and your instructor. This section may include experiential knowledge that has compelled you to pursue your chosen issue and any material that has been read in class. Use your textbook or knowledge from other classes to help in this section.
Need to Know
This section should identify areas in which you will need to do more reading and research. This section should also include a key terms and phrases chart which will act as a guide for researching online databases.
This is the annotated bibliography for research on very important stuff. I am researching the importance of the very important stuff and how this important stuff is super important. I am attempting to prove that my hypothesis about this super important stuff is right.
(This is merely the introduction for this section of the proposal. Don’t include this before every source!)
Albert, George. Big Book of Super Important Stuff. New York: Anchor Books, (1995): 345-678. Print.
In the book: Big Book of Super Important Stuff: How We Learn to Value the Stuff We Value, George Albert focuses his research on the importance of his chosen topic. He highlights the many differences in the material he encountered during his research. His thesis is that the particular stuff he focused on is the most important of all the super important stuff in the world. He used several points to prove the tremendous importance of his chosen topic; the most noteworthy being: point 1, point 2, point 3, point 4, and point 5. He ends his argument with a call for further exploration, which is a key element in my argument. His original concept can be seen as a call to arms on this extremely important topic. Albert’s argument is logically sound and offers numerous points of view which signals he is writing to a general audience. He does an excellent job exploring the various stances surrounding his chosen topic which shows his targeted audience that he has considered the stances which differ from his. I will use his unique view on his topic to help support my stance on my topic which is related to Albert’s topic in this strong way. His research also works well with my other research in this really great way. Albert’s stance on this issue aligns with three of my other sources and directly disputes Marcus Paperback’s claim that “super important stuff is not really all that important after all. I also plan to use Albert’s stance to call for further research into the area of super important stuff because we can never have enough super important stuff in my field of study. Albert’s claim will mostly emerge as the foundation of my discussion on super important stuff and how it can at times be both good and bad. (306 words)
Tired of low grades? We can help you write a successful essay that will boost your grades.
Order With Us Today!