Question 20 With access and advancements in technology so widespread, there are some individuals that believe that cursive should be removed from school curriculum. Students would benefit from learning about and using new technologies instead of learning an “outdated” skill such as cursive. Students, however, still come across historical documents that are written in cursive in the classroom. Which of the following is an underlying assumption of the argument above? 1. Without the knowledge and skill of cursive, students will lose out on obtaining knowledge and understanding of different historical contexts. 2. Teachers who can read cursive can translate historical documents for their students if need be. 3. Students and teachers of the 21st Century are lazy and rely on technology too much in the classroom. Submit
For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!
What Awaits you:
• High Quality custom-written papers
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality