Bipolar and Related Disorders

The topic is clearly presented and discussed in detail. Content provided is relevant in regards to, and sufficiently fulfills, assignment requirements. An overview of the disorders in this DSM-5 category is evaluated (do not copy and paste from the DSM-5—this must be reworded into your own words.). Potential causes of these disorders (genetics, heredity, environment, spiritual) are examined. The processes that are used to assess for disorders in this category are considered and evaluated. Treatment options for these disorders are assessed. A biblical perspective of these disorders and their treatment is integrated into the content. Future research considerations for disorders in this category are determined.

The topic is presented and discussed appropriately. The Key terms are defined. Content provided is relevant in regards to, and approaches fulfilling assignment requirements but does not fully address each of the required sections in the paper. Complex issues are recognized. The text or academic support is applied but could more fully support the premises presented.

The topic is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations. Not all of the required sections of the paper are fully developed. Contextual factors are weakly considered and lacking in some significant areas. Complex issues are overlooked or handled without care. The application is stretched or not applied.

Not discussed.

The introductory paragraph contains a strong thesis statement and provides an overview of the paper which is carried out throughout the paper.

The introduction paragraph contains a thesis statement which is applied within the paper but not clearly.

The thesis statement and overview of the paper need improvement.

There is no thesis statement or overview of the paper.

Sources are evaluated critically within the paper. The conclusion is strong and clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper.

Sources are used correctly. The conclusion summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper.

Sources are used but not critically evaluated. The conclusion does not adequately summarize the research presented in the body of the paper.

There is no conclusion and / or no sources.

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

Paper is 10-12 pages is length.

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

Paper is somewhat under 10 or over 12 pages in length.

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

Paper is significantly under 10 or over 12 pages in length.

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Abstract, Citations and Reference page are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins.

Citations and format are in current APA with few errors. Cover page, Abstract, Citations, and Reference page are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins.

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Abstract, Citations, and Reference page are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins are incorrect.

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Abstract, Citations, and Reference page are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced or margins are incorrect.

Academic primary and secondary materials are used well and include academic materials. Research incorporates multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate Reference page is provided. Journal articles and books (10 or more). Arguments are correctly supported with research

Academic primary and secondary materials are used and include academic journal articles and books (at least 10). Arguments are supported with appropriate research materials. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate Reference page is provided.

Academic sources are used though popular sources are also incorporated (fewer than 10). Arguments incorporate research but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate Reference page is provided.

Appropriate sources are not used or sources are lacking entirely. Arguments are not supported with research. Opposing viewpoints are dismissed or ignored. Reference page is incomplete or missing.

Comments